i am glad you used the term "dumbed-down" blackpearl.
i guess us europeans tend to see america that way and sometimes are afraid (i know i am) to say it directly.
although i agree that sometimes american products seem to be designed for "dumb" people or "dumb" kids let's nor forget what great things the u.s.a. gave to the world - the first accomplished liberal revolution, 2 world war wins and, last but not least, the incredible capacity to describe complex realities with very few words (and "dumbed-down" is a great example of what i am saying).
but, in this case the "dumbs" seem to be the geobra designers and marketeers (whatever their nationality might be).
thay arrived too late and in a very clumsy (and glue-ish) way to the "pirates of the caribbean" trend and they will be so very "dumb" if they miss the opportunity of 2 extra "master and commander" movies (all the actors have a contract for 2 extra sequels, h.m.s. surprise is finishing its last repairs and the only thing that seems to be missing is a confirmation from russell crowe)
lol, I wasn't trying to be profound on the U.S.'s contributions to the world and history in general, lol, just about toys and how they are marketed to kids, begging the question "are they dumbed down because our kids are 'dumber?' Or do our kids get dumber because we patronize them and try to simplify things for them too much in the first place, rather than challenge them and catalyze their imagination. In either case, I fear the trend only leads to a downward spiral.
I have worked in our local education system for a number of years, and I have noticed a similar trend in our educational approach to our youth. Rather than challenge them at the risk of failure (which is quantified as substandard marks in schools) which also makes the school look bad and affect the school's success statistics and subsequent funding, the schools, instead, will "dumb down" the education to make goals more easily attainable by a larger (and less adept) number of students, thereby increasing their effectivity numbers, as well as making the schools more eligible for continued funding.
In the end, it boils down to this:
I see a trend in America where it is assumed that catering to intelligent people would mean excluding a majority of a target audience which would result in lower profit, so they lower the bar, so to speak, thereby generalising the market to a greater mass, thereby increasing their profitability margins.
It's all about the money
Back on topic, this means a costly remould (or new mould) of a giant complex ship, according to apparent market trends, would most likely be deemed economically unfeasible for Playmobil (USA) at this time.
I have more confidence that such a ship would be more successful in Europe and abroad, and even if created, I have high doubts that the US retailers will buy into the product (as is, anyway, without dumbing it down for us).
I know Playmobil is a German toy, but, at the risk of having a big American head (as I am Yankie-born myself), I would venture to say that Playmobil does in fact consider its US marketing base highly in their economic and marketing decisions. Not that the whole world revolves around us Yanks :p