The article is not biased. It states that he strangled his first wife, was a threat to the state, etc. If anything it is very unbiased because it merely reports the facts and does not give an opinion one way or the other. As history is supposed to.
Maybe for the simple fact that it is unbiased that we, who are used to the VERY biased thing that is called "news" today it is hard to accept something that does not present an overt opinion one way or another.
History is never unbiased. History is always colored by times and fashions of the day. It is constantly reinvented. For instance we describe the age of slavery totally different as compared to 50 years ago, and even then history was already a science.
Furthermore this site is catholic. Why would they make another encyclopedia? What is wrong with the others?
I have a deep suspicion for religions. All religions (do not be fooled by my avatar). Religions bring out the worst in people. The conquest of America is a good example of that. No offence and peace to you, it is just my opion.
Furthermore this article makes a lot of claims, stated of matter of factly, but unsubstanciated.
I quote: For the sake of policy, Cortés was, in general, far from cruel towards the Indians.
Compared to who and what? Atilla the hun was cruel. Today we would describe him as a genocist.
Please compare the article on wikipedia, which at least states different accounts and opions to compare for yourself.
Sure the aricle doesn't seem to give a lot of opionons, but that is only appearance. A lot is left out: the roll of the native peoples in the conqeust of Mexico, the effects of different European diseases and the social upheaval coming from that.
And there is this sentence: The execution of Cuauhtemotzin on the journey to Honduras was another instance
That is a very colored description of what happened. The word execution is a link to an article about executions. It explains about due legal proces and capital ponishment.
In fact this man was interogated (tortured, as was the practice that day) and then hung, all of it taking place while traveling through the jungle. Would you call that execution? Even his comtempories thought there was no evidence to find this man guilty of a plot to kill Cortes.
I started my earlier reply with "I think..." It was only my opion.