Which official Playmobil Knight would stand at the end??

[Klickus Mobilius]

A knight is by definition a horse rider.

Would two halves of coconuts do?   

[Wolf Knight]

Would two halves of coconuts do?   

 
you'll need a squire to do that..certainly you'd not expect any noble knight hopping up and down clapping coconuts, would you?
 

[Wolf Knight]

What about this one?? What do you all think?

http://www.collectobil.com/catalogue/items/3024.htm


Baden 

I like him Baden... he is well prepared but he seems so delicate... I have 9 of these knights and they look great as ceremonial escort!

[Sir Gareth]

Rasputin,

 A knight is by definition a horse rider.

 Horsemanship is indeed what a very big part of people associate a knight as being but in the era of knights we are talking about they also had to follow the old code Chivarly.

 Sir Gareth has a horse and follows the old code of chivalry because he doesn't wear heavy armour doesn't mean that he's not a proper knight.

 In a fair fight on horse or on foot a lighter more agile knight with a sword stands a better chance of deafeating a knight weighed down with heavy armour trying to swing a heavy axe or other weapon.

[Ali Baba]

Would two halves of coconuts do?   

  I think it depends on which spiecies of swallow has flown them in.

[Ali Baba]

Horsemanship is indeed what a very big part of people associate a knight as being but in the era of knights we are talking about they also had to follow the old code Chivarly.

 Sir Gareth has a horse and follows the old code of chivalry because he doesn't wear heavy armour doesn't mean that he's not a proper knight.

 In a fair fight on horse or on foot a lighter more agile knight with a sword stands a better chance of deafeating a knight weighed down with heavy armour trying to swing a heavy axe or other weapon.

I didn't say a knight never fights on foot. I said a footman is not a knight. Chivalry is derived from the french word for horse. In Dutch and German the word for knight (ridder/ritter) means rider.

[Sir Gareth]

I think it depends on which spiecies of swallow has flown them in.

Yes it does, African or European and you had better get the question right or else, Arrrrrggghhhh

 Back to the topic of who is the ultimate klicky knight.

The answer is in the Monty python film we all obviously like, look how they are all dressed.

A lightly armed knight with a basic chain mail suit, balanced sword and a good strong shield will defeat any of the heavily dressed knights like 3315 and 3669.

[Giorginetto]

Bsck to tho topic of the original question , still a horsed with stroner armour and weaponry to apprear in my opinion , 3669 still on top of hte leage, the dragon knight and special mentioned dont even have a horse, heavy armour etc. 3669 top of the food chain people ...still.... the champion therefore

 

[Ali Baba]

Why? Because he has to bring 2 of his mates along to help him on and off his horse?

Besides, he'll get stuck if the ground is too soft. Easy pickings, I say, this one.

On a playing field, during the weekend he may be quite dangerous, but in a real battle he doesn't stand a chance.

[Justindo]

Fully armored knights were more agile than most people think.  Although their armor did weigh a considerable amount, the weight was well distributed and knights trained in it often, so they were used to it.  A crane or squires were not necessary for a knight to mount his horse.