I think I have done it!!!
This is what I have found... and at the end of it all, my solution!
System X is not only not as tall as steck, but not as wide:
This means you need a connector that is shaped like a Z, like this:
But that poses other problems.
So I worked and worked on some designs, nearly all day.
I realisedthat in order to be "perfect",
The connector would need to accomidate both steck and system X:
But in the
same end,
So I tried this:
But again realised that there was still the difference in width to deal with...
So I was back at work and came up with the end solution, THIS:
When it's on the side it looks more like these,
Looking down at the slots, and looking with "x-ray vision" at what the inside looks like:
The tops "mingle" well with the connector, as you know the top of a system X castle wall is different from a steck castle's top. Here is what it looks like with the amount of space provided by the bridge piece:
If you have any questions I will answer them as best I can.
I think this will work, The difference in height does not matter because the system X connector is all along the "bridge" piece, and the piece is made to the height of steck so it will fit both. If the other system X pieces are larger then the steck pieces then the bridge piece can be made taller, elongating the system X connection to accomidate the higher system X piece.
Hopefully this helps, and I am so glad we get to have a role in designing the transition.
