Do you understand now why I was/am confused
In dutch we say: comparing apples with pears
The advantage that non-photoshopers have is that they look for some nice piece of nature to have as a background, whereas photoshopers look for some virutal piece a background... My consideration was more about the difference between pictures with customized and non-customized objects. I have that feeling that a moderate picture with a custom has more 'potential' than a nice picture without custom...
Now, something just happened (
) during doing the dishes...
The big issue with whatever contest is the word 'contest'... Even when you don't 'win' anything (besides eternal fame
) people start to do the most crazy things to be first. What I already suggested on the other forum, was to have a system in place where everybody could post his/her picture of the month. Instead of voting, ALL pictures are displayed on the frontpage according to a
rotation scheme.
I like this idea because it's not only the 'best' pictures that are displayed, but every participant's picture comes into the pictre
............................
Coming back to the calendar (do you mean a printed version?), which is a wonderful idea, I have the following idea: What you see on some download pages is that there's a ranking based on the times that e.g. a certain background has been downloaded. This could be some
'hall of fame', where the top-12 can be used for the calendar.
...............................
Shouldn't we also do something with wallpapers