1 Christianity--------2.1 billion
2 Judaism------------15 million
3 Hinduism-----------851 mil
4 Islam----------------1.3 bil
5 Buddhism------------375 mil
6 Shintoist-------------2.8 mil
7 Sikhism--------------25 mil
8 Baha'ism-------------7.5 mil
9 Jainism--------------15 mil
* info from 2004
Well, I guess it's less controversial than the Roman nazi thread...
Shintoism is a very indigenous set of Japanese traditional practices. The term itself was not coined until the Meiji era when the imperial-reformers sought to underscore Japanese nativity. "Shinto" practices and Buddhist practices are so entwined in Japan that it is not accurate to say Person A is a Shintoist and Person B is a Buddhist.
The number of true Buddhists in China is greatly under-represented in the figures above. "Atheism" is the official religion of the Chinese Communist Party but Buddhist beliefs didn't suddenly vanish in the 60 years since 1948.
As for Playmobil, I agree with Bogro's comment that Zirndorff is a German city, probably a lot like Saint Louis (where I live) in terms of being predominately "European" in culture. For Playmobil to make a church isn't really making a statement.
I mean, I'm an atheist, but I grew up around churches. I know about Church weddings, Friar Tuck, et cetera. Most Playmobil consumers are Americans and Europeans who identify with the familiar. Japanese (and the increasing Chinese) consumer base likely are attracted to the exoticism of the very-European Playmobil.
So everybody is probably happy.
Yes, I would love a well-made Playmobil Buddhist temple. But, I'd shy from calling the lack of one narrow-mindedness or political agenda.
Incidentally, the Taj Mahal is a mausoleum to an Indian Sultan's wife (or mistress). It isn't a religious center, but is treated like a museum. So, Lego's inclusion of the Taj is an architectural gesture rather than a religious gesture.
Finally, a key thing we are overlooking: according to Richard, the Magic Castle Theme began as an Arabian Knights theme, and in keeping with that, PM has released a few Indian-like prince sets (3835, 3837, 4505) and the magic castle is similar in shape to what we think of as Mughal architecture. For whatever reason, those sets didn't lead to full-fledged themes. Maybe consumers were less interested in stuff they didn't recognize.
So, don't blame Playmobil! Remember, it's a commerical toy, not a Social Studies course!
-Tim
PS. On my trips to Japan, China, and Korea, I've looked hard for Asian Playmobil-equivalents. Toys there, even the ones that are homegrown, tend to be sci-fi, fantasy, or modern military. Chinese kids, for instance, don't seem to be as interested in playing with Three Kingdoms era toys as we are playing with King Arthur-era toys. It seems Asian kids love the modern or space-fantasy and are less interested in historical toys or "culturally relevant" toys.