Heather, you were right! I made a mistake in reporting the code the first time - I had written it down without taking a photo. With the info from the fragment, the code you referenced is complete, except for the set number anyway.
Though I wonder what the rest of the numbers mean? 20 something 01, I think. 
Good to hear - 30 92 047(0, the 0 is assumed after 7-digit part numbers) it shall be. The rest... a mysterious suffix like the PW's and DDu's, I suppose. I bet the stuff on the other end is a printing test.
Graham, I'd be suspicious that I'm being made fun of, except that I know you're even worse than I am!
